A Soldier's Letter To the Taliban
Sound Off!
Sound off in Comments
Share This Blog Post
Can't see the 'ShareThis' icon? Reload your page view by pressing Shift and clicking Refresh at the same time.In response to the Taliban's recent threat-filled 'letter to the Canadian people,' a Canadian officer has a few choice words
George Petrolekas, Citizen Special
Published: Thursday, August 21, 2008An open letter to the Taliban:
You purport to speak for Afghans and Afghanistan yet your only questionable legitimacy comes from the barrel of a gun, the slaughter and intimidation of innocents supported by the profits of the opium crop that you protect. You do not answer for the night letters you send, the people you behead, or the villages you hold hostage whose only crime is that they do not agree with your views.
And yet you dare say that we come to kill your innocent, equally forgetting the deaths of thousands of innocents committed by your fellow travellers in crime; so conveniently forgetting the slaughters of Bali, Madrid, London and New York City. Your words may sound high and mighty, but your actions and deeds betray the truth of what you are: a movement committed to the enslavement and servitude of those whose voices cannot be heard. You revile America forgetting that it gave you more food, flour and wheat than any other nation while you were in power; what did you do for the Afghan people?
People you have fooled say that Afghanistan was more secure under your rule. But what is security under an institutionalized cabal that "legally" kills, amputates and disfigures those who do not agree with it?
You kill the defenceless, and those who come to give hope, simply because they are foreign, and you do so not as men, but hiding behind the disguise of women, or using women and children as shields, or using those who have lost the ability to think to carry out your crimes. And in doing so, you defile the very words of your God and his prophet. How can the prophet feel peace in the face of your cowardice? You have killed more Afghan men, women and children by your bombs and attacks than any other nations combined. While we may have killed innocents by accident, those deaths pale in comparison to the thousands you have killed by design. God may forgive us the loss of those souls; he will never forgive you.
You condone the poppy, protect it, encourage it, tax it, and sell it. Yet the damage to your own countrymen is not of importance. A country that could once feed itself now cannot, and in the wake of the opium trail there are hundreds of thousands of new addicts in Afghanistan, and greater numbers in Pakistan, Iran, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan and all the other republics that border you. Your selfish lust for power does not even respect those of your own religion.
You ignore the voice of the Afghan people as expressed in votes that your own intimidations could not suppress. The United Nations supervised those elections. They were more closely watched and safeguarded than almost any other elections in history; and people not only voted with their hands on a ballot, but with their feet in travelling miles for the first opportunity afforded them to at least have a voice in their affairs.
You speak of respect in the community of the world and the community of nations, yet it is you who ordained the destruction of the Buddhas of Bamiyan. These were not yours to destroy, they were the legacy of humanity and its existence on this planet, but as always, you turned a deaf ear and a blind eye to anything that does not ascribe to your views. You kill doctors, teachers and aid workers, making a mockery of the words "God the merciful and compassionate." Your deeds make you the ultimate apostates, your actions are the ultimate heresy.
And even in the face of such cowardice, lies and betrayal of the Afghan people, the hand of peace has been extended to you time and again with the simple request that you denounce violence and intimidation. But no, that does not serve your needs, which are among the vilest ever seen on this planet: simply to ply a nation back into servitude.
And so, we are in Afghanistan to give voice and protection to those whose voices cannot be heard.
If Afghans truly wish us to leave, we will do so. We are not an occupying power. We have never attempted to impose our religious or political values on your nation. We accept Afghanistan as an Islamic republic. We accept that democracy will not and may never be like the way we practise it and that freedom of speech and religion will not be like ours. But we do assist that vast majority of Afghans who believe that a girl has a right to go to school, that a village, a district, a province and a nation should allow its people to have a voice in their own affairs.
And in the face of your threats, you will also find that we are made of sterner stuff as are the Afghan people who only wish to live lives in some semblance of security. Liberty does not come freely and ours has been a steep price to pay, and that gives us no joy, but we pay that price in the fervent belief that to not do so is to consign a nation and a people to a darker fate at your hands. And thus we will continue until you are no more.
If those Afghan voices tell us that we should leave, then we will. But we will never leave them alone to face the threats and killings that so brutally demonstrate what you are, because you do not and never have spoken for the Afghan people. And with God's help, you never will.
George Petrolekas was involved in the Afghan mission from 2003 to 2007, representing Canada at NATO's operational headquarters in Afghanistan.



Comments
In regard to George
In regard to George Petrolekas' open letter.
This is such an inspiration. No doubt the troops feel just as he does, and so should the rest of us.
Then there is the likes of Alexandre Turdeau. Another Liberal and another weak-kneed, spineless response to a tough war. The Liberal way.
All we really need in this country is another Turdeau !
Said with far more eloquence
Said with far more eloquence than I'd manage, and it says it all. I sincerely hope this letter makes it all the way to Bin Laden and the taliban leadership. And Sasha Trudeau for that matter. We need to stay in Afghanistan until the job is finished, and I truly believe that will be for at least a generation, albeit in a gradually reducing role as the legitimate government is able to take on a greater role in their security. And that is why we'll succeed where the Russians failed. Russia tried to rule from afar, but we are giving them to tools to rule themselves.
A Soldier's Letter to the Taliban
Well said!
I think this answers the big question
I think this answers the big question, Should we leave? A difinitive NO! from a man who has been there and done that. It is time we and the rest of the western world treat this as the war it is. We are trying to eliminate a evil as the Nazi's of WWII Germany and we need to make it a national effort the same as WWI and WWII. The nations involved are often treating this much as the americans treated Vietnam, and we all know how that ended. A fragile peace was left with an enemy that doesn't respect peace. Let us learn for a change from past mistakes and make being a member of taliban and al qaeda is a sure way to shorten one's life. Marters may find this a good thing, but those cowards that send them out to die don't want to sacrifice themselves.
Emboldening the Pro-War front
An interesting letter that ignorantly dismisses that the majority of Canadians do not want us to be in Afghanistan. Our nation's convictions are counting for less and less in this hegemony by the world policing United States.
The open letter from the Taliban and this response by Colonel Petrolekas has served to marginalize the anti involvement in Afghanistan movement in Canada (OutNow, Ceasefire), and embolden those who support our involvement. We should remember where we historically stood on interventionalist affairs, before we so readily become involved in conflicts that risk dangerous blowback, and discredit the peaceful reputation of this nation on the world stage.
history repeated
that sound juct like chamberlain in 1939 "peace for our time" worked out well then. no appeasment no negotiation. And thank god for the marginalization of left wing nuts like outnow and ceasefire.
Learn Your History
Sounds like? There's a difference between handing a nation over to an imperialistic power like Nazi Germany, and simply retreating our 2500 out of the total 47 000 troops in a nation we have no reason to be in. The US have 150 000 troops in Iraq. They'd hardly miss us.
Ceasefire is an anti-war lobbyist group that is partially responsible for us not becoming involved in the Iraq war, and they are involved in various other anti-war causes. Yeah, it's a real "nut" thing to do, to save our nation's peaceful reputation, and the lives of more Canadian soldiers, by trying to maintain Canada's usual anti-interventionalist stance in affairs where we have no domestic interests...
rrrrrrrrright.
yeah the freedoms our grandfathers fought for hold no domestic interest.(sarcasm) the only thing that keep us out of iraq was a liberal government pandering to the left wing wingnuts. freedom cost,and is i am sad to say,is paid in blood. the fanatic islamic groups want to destroy our way of life, our soceity and enslave freedoms we have fought for. canadas rep as a peaceful nation is fairly new and stems from the fact that years of liberal governments did not eant to pay the cost of defense and hid behind the usa. the bill on this is coming due now when we send troops into harms way with crap equipment. how do we protect our artic rights and our people when ones like you wish to stick your head in the sand.we sleep safe tonite because of the fact that we have men and women willing to fight those who wish to destroy our way of life.
Warmongerer
I said 'usual interventionalist stance'. Given Hitler's intention to dominate the globe, it was obviously something that couldn't have been ignored.
The Taliban are something entirely different. They do not have the means to attempt anything more than an oppressive regime of their homeland. They pose no threat to Canada(or at least, didn't, until we invaded.) Now, whether you believe the Taliban threats made in the letter are honest, or just an attempt at manipulation, or otherwise, the fact remains that they have singled out Canada in a group of armed forces on their land.
A fight against an enemy that poses no threat to your nation is not a fight for freedom. It is a fight for other reasons, namely to support the US Hegemony.
If, however, you believe so strongly that these 'fanatic islamic groups' must be wiped out, perhaps you should try to do something to have Canada invade Pakistan, where numerous such groups are stationed. That, and perhaps Iran. But I doubt you'd put your balls where your mouth is.
freedom
why do they people of other countries not have the right to the same freedoms we do? our troops believe they do, for leftist wackos to say lets hide behind our border is a large injustice.the taliban have always made it known that the destruction of the western civilaztion is their goal. they wish to force their twisted veiw of islam on us. hitler was only able to acheive what he did because in 1933 there were people like you say the same thing about him that you are saying about the taliban now. as for iran, now would be a better time than later, the same for north korea."the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." or " people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men(and women) stand ready to do violence on their behalf".keep your head in the sand jon and when you pull it out, your wife and daughters will be FORCED to wear a veil and behave in a mannner that they are told to.
Add New Comment