Should a Man Have to Pay Support For A Child He Didn't Know Existed?

Tammy Robert

Sound Off!

Got something to say?
Sound off in Comments

Share This Blog Post

Can't see the 'ShareThis' icon? Reload your page view by pressing Shift and clicking Refresh at the same time.

The obvious answer in my mind is 'yes', but did you watch Dr Phil yesterday?  Because for some people, it's not so straightforward.

Matt Dubay is a twenty-something IT guy from Michigan who is ordered to pay child support for his ex-girlfriend's daughter.  He has filed a lawsuit twice (and it's been thrown out twice) addressing the issue of male reproductive rights - essentially arguing that if a pregnant woman has the choice to decline the responsiblity for her child (whether via abortion or adoption), then a man involved in an unintentional pregnancy should also have the choice of declining his responsiblities. 

To date Dubay pays for the kid, but refuses to interact or care for the baby girl, and continues to launch legal and media campaigns to further the issue.  He says he made it very clear to The Ex before having sex that he was not interested in being a father, and she assured him that she not only was she on the birth control pill for medical reasons, she was unable to have kids because of a medical condition.  Hence, the boinking proceeded unhindered and unprotected, then "a few weeks later" The Ex called him and told him she was pregnant.

Mel Feit, director of the National Center for Men (which prepared the lawsuit), is hopefully going to be appearing on Gormley next week. He says that "a woman can choose to have intimacy and still have control over the subsequent consequences...no one has ever asked a federal court if that means men should have some similar say."

Yesterday's episode of Dr Phil was, as per usual, a train wreck, but a fascinating one nonetheless.  Mel Feit and Matt Dubay squared off against infamous California feminist lawyer Gloria Allred.  Though Feit and Dubay argued their points somewhat convincingly, I couldn't help agreeing with Allred (despite loathing her fingerpointing, shriekingly bad delivery), in that Dubay is not the victim he so wants to be in this situation - the baby is, and he's got to take responsibility for her as a consequence of his choices - whether he made them under false pretences or not.  Biology being what it is and all, if Dubay absolutely, 100% wanted to prevent fatherhood, he could have kept it in his pants - or at least used a condom to minimize the risk even further.  

That being said, I'm certain that readers and listeners will have plenty of diverse opinions on this topic, so watch and listen for the date and time of the segment next week on JGL (right now I'm thinking Tuesday, but will depend on the guests - I'll keep you posted). 

Tammy Robert is the Executive Producer of 'The John Gormley Live Show' - listen live every weekday morning from 8.30am - 12.30pm on NewsTalk 650 or NewsTalk 980.

 

Comments

same

the same agrument could be made for stopping aborition. we talk all day long about the womens rights. by your agrument she also give that up by not keeping her pants on, but also give up more by lying. you are right the the child is the victim but the father is not the perp, that would be the mother.

To be or not to be... That is the question.

I have been on both sides of this coin, both sides have valid points. I also watched Dr. Phil yesterday; I was quite impressed with Mel Feit and felt the same regarding Allred.

I have 19 year old son, the result of a failed, non-married relationship. His Bio-father paid child support from the age of 2 until he graduated high-school. The support was not voluntary or regular and he has not seen my son since he was 8. I am sure that if you spoke to his bio-father the story would be entrapment... blah, blah, blah. I have heard the story so many times from different men it has become a joke. I highly doubt that every man has been responsible and forthright about his intentions regarding children resulting from the sex they are about to have.

Birth control fails, that is a fact. Condoms break, pills get forgotten, should it be the woman’s sole responsibility for a child resulting in failed or forgotten contraception. The answer to that question is no. If a woman lies and does in fact entrap a man, how are you ever going to prove it? It will be his word against hers, as with most intimate relationships there are only two people present.

I did not sympathise with Dubay, the fact is that if his ex-girlfriend was taking responsibility for her body, he should have been taking responsibility for his... Buy some condoms or don’t have sex! Chances are better if her contraception failed, his wouldn’t have. To blindly believe that her contraception method was sound and to proceed unprotected is just plain stupid in this day and age. Dubay, being so adamant about not wanting children, did not consult his doctor about how to protect himself against unwanted pregnancy. Almost every woman has had this conversation with their doctor, mother or guidance councillor.

The victim in this case and all cases like it is the child. Should a child suffer for the mistakes of the parents? Should a child grow up fatherless because he didn’t want to be a parent? Dubay should step up to the plate as far as I am concerned.

I have been on the other side of the coin with my husband, who has been a wonderful dad to my son. It is frustrating and upsetting what some women will do and the lengths they will go to where children are concerned. I’ve seen good men, who love their children and pay their child support go through hell with their ex-wives and girlfriends. For some of those men, it would have been easier and better for the child had they walked away.

I have always preached to my son that he is responsible for his own body, condoms were readily available. Did I encourage him to have sex...? No! However if he was going to make the choice to have sex, I wanted him to be informed and protected.

If I was a man I would demand they come up with better birth control methods for men to take and be responsible for. That every doctor’s office had a large sign that says “MEN - Talk to your doctor about ways to protect yourself from unwanted pregnancy”! This is where the male advocacy agencies should be concentrating their efforts, and not after the fact!

I saw the show, and other

I saw the show, and other shows that Mel Feit has been on. I'm thrilled he's going to be on JGL (not a fan of Feit myself but I do find his position intreguing). Keep us updated on when he will be on next week! Great interview catch Tammy!

P.S. What did you think of the anger and resentment held by the other couple on the show, the married couple with 2 kids who are paying child support for an ex-girlfriend's baby. The wife seemed very bitter about it all and the whole while I kept thinking, "wow, she's so jealous!" but then realized I would probably feel the same.

I pose this question in

I pose this question in preparation...

What if the mother wanted the abortion but the father did not? Who do you think gets their way?

I though the women's rights movement was all about equality?

While I agree he should have to pay to support the child, this story touches on a bigger issue of how men are looked at when it comes to raising kids and the how they are looked at in the eyes of civil law.

Everytime you have

Everytime you have intercourse you take the risk of a child being conceived. Nothing is 100% but not have sex at all. If you lie in the bed you got to pay the price if a child is conceived. Yes in some aspects of "men's reproductive right" like if a woman is pregnant that she only has the only choice of what will happen and the man has none. But no matter what if you are the father or the mother you must pay the price and support the child. It does go both ways. I know deadbeat dad and I know deadbeat moms. Yes the child suffers when one parent doesn't want anything to do with them. But the big thing is lets start thinking about the child that never asked to be here in the first place. To everyone out there......If you don't want to have a child with the person you are with just remember that birthcontrol doesn't always work so don't take the risk and don't sleep with them as accidents happen and you maybe stuck with them in your life for the next 18 years and sometimes longer.

He made his choice when he

He made his choice when he became intimate. He should pay child support. Sounds like the child is lucky not to have this jerk in her life.

The difference in rights here is that a woman puts her life at serious risk by proceeding with a pregnancy, a man does not. That is why the man's last choice is to become intimate. After that it is the woman's choice.

Back pay for child support

This is an interesting topic and I missed the show. I feel that Feit should pay but I don't think he has to have anything to do with the child if he doesn't want to. It's tragic but don't you think it would be better for the child to grow up sans father than with one who doesn't love him/her? That resents him/her?

On this theme I was intrigued to hear a story of back pay for a child a man never knew existed. Recently a friend of a friend was told he had to pay years of child support he missed out on even though he had no idea the child ever existed. The child is now 20 years old and wants to go to college - she needs tuition. This I don't understand. The woman purposefully kept the child from him, he had no opportunities to show he was interested in the child and now here he is having to remortgage the house, sell RRSPs, etc. because the courts said so.

I would have your friend

I would have your friend question paying years in child support as the maximum that can be claimed for arrears, for that is what this is, is 3 years (according to the SCC).

Also, did your friend go for paternity testing to prove that he is, indeed, the father of the child in question?

Pay

Hey should pay child support.

But he should also be able to sue and collect from her for fraud. afterall, she did lie to him and that lie lead directly to him being forced to have to pay child support.

But yes, having a child is a responsiblity, and it amazes how the person who is the most wrong here (the mother) is the one who gets all the benifit and no consequence.

wow..."the person who is the

wow..."the person who is the most wrong here (the mother) is the one who gets all the benifit and no consequence."

um.. no consequence? How about raising a child??

And how do you get one person being "the most wrong"? It took two to make the baby, last time I checked.

I agree with others that it is the child who suffers, and I think the guy should pay child support. "No glove, no love"

Add New Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Comments are moderated by Rawlco Radio in accordance with our terms of service.