The Essentials: Food, Shelter, Lululemon...

Tammy Robert

Sound Off!

Got something to say?
Sound off in Comments

Share This Blog Post

Can't see the 'ShareThis' icon? Reload your page view by pressing Shift and clicking Refresh at the same time.

I'll admit up front that I'm a total hypocrite on this topic. 

I own Lululemon gear, and really do like it.  The quality is fabulous and it makes my ass look pretty good.  (Any help I can get in that department is much appreciated.)

Honestly - the pieces I have were purchased for me as gifts, though I certainly played a role by placing them high on my wish list  (cough<GormleyChristmas>cough). 

Anyway, that's enough in my defense.  Hypocrisy firmly established.

Saskatchewanians are in the delightful position of not necessarily feeling the same impact of the Canadian economic downturn as the rest of the country - perhaps we're not needing to cut back as much as those, say, in the East - where Lululemon stores crop up on as many street corners as Starbucks. 

So when asked how Lululemon planned on weathering a scaled-back profit forecast, one of the board of directors replied that the chain was in a much better position to weather the spending slump than other retailers because "it is selling an accessory to consumers' pursuit of wellness and exercise and yoga".

Seriously?  Is this guy really so out to lunch that he figures the average spender is going to prioritize the 'Boogie Pant' alongside eating?  Or keeping their car another month? 

As long as they can ensure a comfortable Lotus position.

It's either that, or what this economic 'crisis' really means is that the income gap is simply just getting wider, with the upper layer still comfortably able to afford, as this guy added, "goods that contribute to their health and wellness".  Like the Origami Deep V tank - not food or cold medicine or anything frivolous like that.

Thinking about it, we're not immune to this theory in Saskatchewan either, as the recent story on the impossibly overcrowded Saskatoon shelter highlights.

I'm sorry, as much as I love money (even moreso when I have it) and don't begrudge those who have lots of it (because I plan on joining them eventually) - people who make comments like this need a slap.  Companies like Lululemon will continue to make money, but don't insult our intelligence by pretending it will because its a necessity to those who want to stay healthy.

Before I sign off - for those of you who read my previous post on male reproductive rights - Mel Feit, director of the National Centre for Men in New York will be joining John on Wednesday morning (October 30th) at 10am.  It's going to be good.

Tammy Robert is the Executive Producer of 'The John Gormley Live Show' - listen live every weekday morning from 8.30am - 12.30pm on NewsTalk 650 or NewsTalk 980.

 

Comments

Tammy doesn't want Lululemon

Tammy doesn't want Lululemon 'to insult...[her]... intelligence', eh? Well, speaking as one who's never seen her 'ass' - I think Lululemon should be the least of her worries....You go girl!

Your Ass, Sexy Halloween Costumes and your Public Persona

Hey Tammy, I get that you often take a contrary position to Gorms - for the sake of the show, but the first thing you should know about developing a Public Persona is staying consistent in your views and positions. SO if you're against sexy costumes, what do you care about how your ass looks?
Great job otherwise - and it's fun to hear from you from time to time!

Vern

Hi Vern - You're the first person whose comment has prompted me to reply on my blog. However, your point did cross my mind last night so I think it's worth a followup on this post. At the end of the day, I don't think it's inconsistent whatsoever to have my opinion on over-the-top, slutty costumes, yet admit to wearing clothing - a pair of pants - that flatters or makes me feel good about how I look. Are you saying that because I don't want to wear those costumes on Halloween, I have no right to care about my appearance any other day?
Again, and I pointed this out in the Slut-to-ween blog also, if a woman wants to wear a slutty costume, that's her well-earned choice. It's just not for me, and I question why on the one night when we can be whatever we want, so many women go down that road...
I'm well aware of the need to be consistent in my beliefs inside (and outside) the public domain Vern - it's your opinion that I'm contradicting myself and that's fine. I see the two issues entirely differently - that's the beauty of working in the opinion biz.
Finally - I don't ever contradict John for the "sake of the show". When John and I discover we have opposing opinions - and it's not that often - sometimes we take it to the airwaves to let the listeners decide.
Thanks for your thoughts Vern, and keep listening and reading.

Add New Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Comments are moderated by Rawlco Radio in accordance with our terms of service.